Page 2 of 2

Re: Roseanne Cancelled

PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:50 pm
by SciFiFisher
Because I feel like beating the horse a bit more. And because it does have some good information about the spin off that is in the works. And because as noted in previous comments it seems that the Tweet that ended it all for Roseanne may have been the straw that broke the Camel's back

Re: Roseanne Cancelled

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2018 8:49 pm
by SciFi Chick
SciFiFisher wrote:Because I feel like beating the horse a bit more. And because it does have some good information about the spin off that is in the works. And because as noted in previous comments it seems that the Tweet that ended it all for Roseanne may have been the straw that broke the Camel's back


After the whole James Gunn fiasco, I am soooooo not the least bit fucking interested in any defense, by ABC of their treatment of Roseanne.

Call me a throwback, but I'm a capitalist through and through. I'd much rather see Roseanne go down because people don't want to watch her. And if they do want to watch her, no matter what she says, let's investigate that.

But, goddammit, don't tell me what to believe. I don't think what ABC did to Roseanne was right. I don't think what Disney did to James Gunn was right. And I don't think what the large social media platforms did to Alex Jones was right.

I am not the LEAST bit interested in having elite assholes determine what the rest of us do and don't hear and see. I am FAR more interested in letting the market decide.

The same motherfuckers that are so against the above named will totally support Roman Polanski, a man who drugged and butt raped a 13-year-old. So, everyone in Hollywood and the media can get off their fucking high horses right now.

:scream:

Re: Roseanne Cancelled

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:41 am
by geonuc
You don’t think her cancellation was a marketing decision by the network?

Re: Roseanne Cancelled

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2018 1:53 am
by SciFi Chick
geonuc wrote:You don’t think her cancellation was a marketing decision by the network?


If it was, it wasn't a very good one. And yes, I did think that at the time. But now that they've done the same to James Gunn? I'm honestly starting to think corporate espionage to bring down Disney.