vendic wrote:She said she was sorry.
I had this same discussion with my SIL... and what I basically said was... for this particular twatwaffle... I could care less... anyone else? I would take more care. But for PFC Manning... never.Rommie wrote:DimSum, you know I love you, but I feel it really cheapens your message when it's filled with snide things like putting Manning's chosen name in quotes and talking about "...not that the VA would pay for whatever it is s/he is claiming his/her issues are." Particularly because I don't think you would do the same if you met any other trans person and they said "I prefer to be called Betsy and be referred to as she."
Rommie wrote:DimSum, you know I love you, but I feel it really cheapens your message when it's filled with snide things like putting Manning's chosen name in quotes and talking about "...not that the VA would pay for whatever it is s/he is claiming his/her issues are." Particularly because I don't think you would do the same if you met any other trans person and they said "I prefer to be called Betsy and be referred to as she."
Fisher wrote:For many of us in the fraternity the fact that the government did not convince the court doesn't mean he was not guilty of that crime. Merely that the prosecution didn't have enough evidence to convince the court.
SciFiFisher wrote:Rommie wrote:DimSum, you know I love you, but I feel it really cheapens your message when it's filled with snide things like putting Manning's chosen name in quotes and talking about "...not that the VA would pay for whatever it is s/he is claiming his/her issues are." Particularly because I don't think you would do the same if you met any other trans person and they said "I prefer to be called Betsy and be referred to as she."
It can be difficult to explain. PFC Bradley Manning was part of a fraternity that takes a very harsh view of oath breaking. After he was caught and convicted he announced that he felt he was struggling with gender identity issues and that he was a female. For many of us in the fraternity it seemed less than sincere and more like a manipulative action on the part of a person who probably has a very serious case of borderline personality disorder. It seems as if he was doing it to gain sympathy and/or to distract people from the fact that he committed a very serious crime. If not treason then he certainly tiptoed right up to it. He was actually charged with a significant crime that if he had been convicted might have resulted in the death penalty. That crime is called "Aiding and Abetting The Enemy During A Time of War". For many of us in the fraternity the fact that the government did not convince the court doesn't mean he was not guilty of that crime. Merely that the prosecution didn't have enough evidence to convince the court.
Which means that for many of us PFC Manning is a traitor. Even worse he is a traitor who gave information to our enemies that more likely than not resulted in the deaths of people who worked with us, for us, or were us. What you are reading in Dimsum's post is not snide remarks. It is barely suppressed rage that this traitorous scumbag did not get what they deserve. And an observation that he is in for a very rude awakening when said scumbag is released from prison and realizes that she does not qualify for any federal benefits including those provided to honorably discharged military veterans
While I agree that it is noble and the right thing to speak of every one with some modicum of respect and dignity it is very, very, very, difficult to do so when it comes to people such as former PFC Bradley Manning.
squ1d wrote:Sorry to return to this topic, but DimSum, I noticed you posting again about LGBTI rights again in another thread, yet here by using mixed pronouns and accusing a person of being "fake transgender", you are engaging in anti LGBTI behaviour. You're not a psychiatrist, and you're not privy to Manning's personal life, so any inferences along those lines are clearly prejudiced. As Rommy points out, if you think he's a traitor based on his actions, then fine. But don't pretend because your "Fraternity" has such special values that you can just get away with being hypocritical.
squ1d wrote:Sorry to return to this topic, but DimSum, I noticed you posting again about LGBTI rights again in another thread, yet here by using mixed pronouns and accusing a person of being "fake transgender", you are engaging in anti LGBTI behaviour. You're not a psychiatrist, and you're not privy to Manning's personal life, so any inferences along those lines are clearly prejudiced. As Rommy points out, if you think he's a traitor based on his actions, then fine. But don't pretend because your "Fraternity" has such special values that you can just get away with being hypocritical.
DimSum wrote:Something else I want to point out, about my rant about Manning. No... I'm not a psychologist. I'm not privy to Manning's personal life. But neither are any of you. You are all taking it on faith that Manning is telling the truth about his/her gender identity issues that didn't come to light until AFTER s/he was sentenced. Why not before? Why join the military? Really?
The defense introduced a photo Manning emailed to her supervisor, Master Sgt Paul Adkins, with the subject line “my problem.” It showed Manning in a blonde wig and wearing lipstick. Clinical Psychiatrist Michael Worsley, who treated Manning in Iraq, also testified about how the military’s “hypermasculine environment” and hostility towards LGBT soldiers could have contributed to Manning’s depression and sense of isolation.
Dr. David Moulton, the forensic psychologist assigned to review Manning’s case, said that Manning was suffering from gender identity disorder, a diagnosis supported by a military sanity board.
DimSum wrote:No... I'm not a psychologist. I'm not privy to Manning's personal life. But neither are any of you. You are all taking it on faith that Manning is telling the truth about his/her gender identity issues
...
S/he is perhaps what s/he says s/he is. You don't know, and neither do I. I am giving him/her the benefit of the doubt. To an extent. And covering all bases.
squ1d wrote:DimSum wrote:No... I'm not a psychologist. I'm not privy to Manning's personal life. But neither are any of you. You are all taking it on faith that Manning is telling the truth about his/her gender identity issues
...
S/he is perhaps what s/he says s/he is. You don't know, and neither do I. I am giving him/her the benefit of the doubt. To an extent. And covering all bases.
This is a very sketchy position for someone claiming to support LGBTI rights.
Incidentally, the military is very famous for having a poor track record there too.
DimSum wrote:I am giving him/her the benefit of the doubt.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests