The older I've gotten, the more I've decided the "why would you ever have your own kids when there are so many kids in the world who need to be adopted?" crowd can stop being so damn judgmental.
Are there kids who need adoptions and loving homes? For sure. I know many, and I know many adoptive parents. But there are so many kids who really don't so much as their parents need a support system to raise their kids that they don't have to offer (or just access to birth control in the first place), and so many kids obtained under dubious circumstances because as your article shows bad people will exploit that market. I'm sure they justify it somewhat to themselves by thinking "I'm giving that kid a better home than they'd have!"... implying love can be bought? Weird the more you think about it.
If anyone's interested in reading up on this at all, check out
Palimpsest- it's a graphic novel I picked up a few months ago, which is the memoir of a woman who was adopted by Swedish parents from South Korea. What struck me about it was how open she was with her emotions- she loved her adoptive parents and had a great childhood, but all the adoption stories were written by adoptive parents and didn't really cover what she felt. Then the emotional implications of learning that she was probably a trafficked child for Western adoption... I think it's very telling that while I knew many kids back in the day adopted from China or Russia etc, those channels don't really exist anymore for my friends looking at the route now. It turns out even the most above board adoption countries have serious ethical implications.
Once again, I'm not trying to diss all adoption by any means. But I do think there were a lot of ethical implications never considered, and now that I've seen friends grow up and struggle with some implications we never heard of when younger, it's made me wonder about some parts of it. Hope that makes sense.