FWIS3

I get rather annoyed when people mistake coverage of one event for the lack of coverage of another.

Example:

Event - James Gandolfini died. Many people talk about this on television and post about it on facebook.

High Horse Reactions I've seen (paraphrased) -

"While everyone is posting about that guy from The Sopranos, soldiers are still fighting and dying in Afghanistan."

"Thank you American media for your continued coverage of James Gandolfini while people are starving in Africa. Makes me sick."

I've seen a few other causes mentioned (Syria, Mali) and probably more that are just not part of my facebook circle. It drives me nuts, because this argument can be made about almost anything. But it's a false equivalence in many ways. Are there problems with mainstream media coverage of issues? Absolutely, keeping in mind that they are only reporting stories that will net them the most viewers and drive up ad revenues (cynical view, but probably true). I guess I just don't like how caring about one thing by definition means I don't care about another, in their view.

Gandolf is dead??
We're all fucked now!

I almost fell into this when I saw the thread that he had passed. I felt the urge to reply how little I cared or post links to people who recently died who I felt were "more important." Then the Greg House inside me said, "You're an Idiot!" If you care so little about the subject, why did you even open the thread? It was close but I caught myself. I wonder why that seems to be a common sentiment. People railed against the space program (still do) with these kinds of non-arguements

Thumper wrote:I almost fell into this when I saw the thread that he had passed. I felt the urge to reply how little I cared or post links to people who recently died who I felt were "more important." Then the Greg House inside me said, "You're an Idiot!" If you care so little about the subject, why did you even open the thread? It was close but I caught myself. I wonder why that seems to be a common sentiment. People railed against the space program (still do) with these kinds of non-arguements

I don't know why people do that, but I agree that it's very common. I now limit myself to only doing it in conversation, and only as a joke. If lots of people are enjoying themselves talking about something I care nothing about, and I can't escape, I just sit there politely and enjoy my drink.

That's why I stay out of all the sports threads.

Incidentally, I recommend you post about people you care about who have passed. I post all the celebrities that I think someone might be interested in, in Lights, Camera - but sometimes I miss news stories or it's in a realm I'm unfamiliar with.

I think it has a lot to do with what I call "zero sum thinking". Another term for it is scarcity thinking. People think that just because you are spending time and energy on one topic it takes away time and energy from the second topic.

So, if the media spends time reporting on the death of a celebrity they are using limited resources that could have been better spent on reporting on the war in Afghanistan.

They don't seem to realize that if a need exists for a news channel about war it will be created. It can coexist beside a news channel about dead celebrities. the time, energy, and resources used for war news does not mean there is less for dead celebrities.

It just means that thier limited attention span will have more ways that they can be distracted.

Aren't you supposed to be in a meeting or something??

How can I possibly enjoy this sunset on a tropical island when the Sun is setting elsewhere and people are drawing their last breath and someone somewhere has just found out their kitten has died and a killer whale just killed a seal?
What kind of sick people can enjoy themselves in this cruel miserable world we live in full of suffering and death?

Always reminds me of this image when this kind of thing happens-

FZR1KG wrote:How can I possibly enjoy this sunset on a tropical island when the Sun is setting elsewhere and people are drawing their last breath and someone somewhere has just found out their kitten has died and a killer whale just killed a seal?
What kind of sick people can enjoy themselves in this cruel miserable world we live in full of suffering and death?

I call that self imposed guilt. Because if you are enjoying yourself you should feel guilty.

I can fall into that one too.

Thumper wrote:I can fall into that one too.

You and GJ both. All I can say is it's not healthy at all... in case you didn't know.

Ooh! Ooh! Me too! Former Catholic, after all.

The ONLY thing you should feel guilty for is masturbating!

Hookers are soooo cheap in this economy. Support your community damnit!