by lady_*nix » Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:56 pm
@Fisher
Yes and no. Especially in the US. Race and class are heavily intertwined here. They're different things (as you can see from any case of a poor white person being believed by cops over a poor Black person). But also e.g. a lot of Black people would be blocked from money, housing, and education, even in the absence of actively racist policies or people, because Southern slavery left that level of material debt. You can see this by just looking at inherited wealth vs. race; on average, white families have far more inherited wealth and savings than Black families.
I've found a useful way to think of it is that oppressions multiply on each other rather than add linearly. Being poor is always shit, but being Black and poor multiplies the suckiness and danger. And even if you're Black and "middle class", your money is effectively worth less. Being Black loses someone class privilege.
A good way to think about it IMO is that oppressions act as multipliers on each other, rather than just stacking linearly. Basically any single way that someone is marginalized, tends to worsen a little the other ways they're marginalized, or create weird new specific cases of being fucked over.
e.g. If you've ever heard the term "intersectional feminism", that was Kimberly Crenshaw's addition to the sociology of racism and sexism, for cases where the statuses of "being Black" and "being a woman" combine to create new and unintuitive forms of oppression. It's... not the correct term for discussing other such cases, e.g. sexism x ableism (Ms. Crenshaw herself has pointed out the problems with that). But I think there are analogies elsewhere at least.
Also relevant, from a different viewpoint: there's a movement called ADOS - American Descendants of Slaves - that works specifically on how race and class blend together. I don't roll with that crowd because they tend to be anti-immigration and pro-business, but the gist of their idea is very good: they want the US government to financially compensate descendants of slaves for the enslavement and abuse of their ancestors, not as an abstract form of justice, but because slavery stole the fruits of their labor and created a concrete and measurable wealth gap. To ADOS, reparations from the US govt aren't about assuaging some sense of guilt, they're about giving back labor value that was literally stolen from enslaved Black families, who are still struggling to dig themselves out of the hole created by that theft.
Anyway yeah, hope that helps contextualize some stuff.