Rosetta/Philae

Re: Rosetta/Philae

Postby Sigma_Orionis » Wed Nov 19, 2014 2:18 pm

geonuc wrote:
Sigma_Orionis wrote:
geonuc wrote:Once again, I get no respect. :cry:


Of course you don't, you're a Nuclear-Geological-Legal-Pinko-Commie-Liberal :P


But I'm a very respectable NGLPCL.


Sez you! :P
Sic Transit Gloria Mundi
User avatar
Sigma_Orionis
Resident Oppressed Latino
 
Posts: 4491
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 2:19 am
Location: The "Glorious Socialist" Land of Chavez

Re: Rosetta/Philae

Postby cid » Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:26 am

Rommie -- saw the NOVA show on the mission. The pix of the comet nucleus were astonishing. They raised the question
of whether the comet is two impacted bodies or just shaped by erosion. From what was in the show, the comet
seemed to be more the product of erosion than an impactor (two big nodules with a connecting neck).
My question is, if there are enough eruptions in the neck that this thingie breaks into two big rocks, then what?
So we have two rocks not touching but accompanying each other due to gravity, or might the various eruptions make them
separate, and now we have two comets? Do they become separate named objects, or something-1 and something-2, or what?

Curious minions want to know...
Dear Algebra -- stop asking us to find your x. She's not coming back - ever. Get over it.
User avatar
cid
Database Ninja Level 1
 
Posts: 829
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 7:37 pm

Re: Rosetta/Philae

Postby Rommie » Wed Nov 26, 2014 1:04 pm

I'm no comet expert, but I know they break apart really often.
Yes, I have a life. It's quite different from yours.
User avatar
Rommie
 
Posts: 3993
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:04 am

Previous

Return to Sci-Tech… and Stuff

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests

cron