Gullible Jones wrote:Oh, it's from the same people as 28 Days Later?
Same director but in this film he also was the writer. I liked 28 Days later. It was a great movie. This not so much.
Thumper wrote:Didn't that come out like 6 months ago? Read a couple interesting reviews. Was interested, rarely get to go, though.
Pretty sure you're right since we hired it from Amazon and streamed to the projector.
If I had to review it, I'd say it was like a poor B grade 50's scifi with modern cgi.
The wife's cousin ( a professor in the classics, philosophy) loved it. He has a fascination with the singularity event for AI so I guess for him it would be fun. I just found it child like in presentation of advanced concepts. For example, why they had the leading programmers, one "the" genius, discuss if the other understands the Turing test for AI. Basically it's a movie made for people not in the tech field about a subject that tries to go into the details of a specialised area of AI research.
It's hard for a movie to break down AI analysis and make it appealing. It would be like making a movie that discusses the intricacies of sub 22nM silicon fabrication. To paraphrase squid in a discussion of AI. This movie had steps:
1) Search engines
2) Mad scientist/programmer
3) ???
4) AI Singularity
5) Terminators!