by SciFiFisher » Tue Apr 01, 2014 4:18 pm
Essentially, it's a form of insider trading. Which is illegal. And I think that's one angle that prosecutors will attack it from. Essentially when you take away the high tech aspect it's about knowing that someone wants to buy widgets and is willing to pay as much as $1 per widget. You know where you can buy the rights to 1 million widgets for 99 cents each. Then you sell the widgets to the guy who wants to buy 1 million widgets for $1 per widget. you pocket the 1 cent difference on 1 million widgets. a fast profit.
Sounds ok until you realize that the way they are doing it is buying the widgets before you can just so they can increase the price and sell them to you. They have knowledge that others do not and they are profiting by it. Which is IMO the text book definition of insider trading.
"To create more positive results in your life, replace 'if only' with 'next time'." — Author Unknown
"Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterward." — Vernon Law