The Supreme Canuck wrote:Yeah, no. I wish it were true, but no. They got thrust out of the test article, sure... but they also got thrust out of a test article modified to not produce thrust.
Smart money's on errors produced by the equipment.
FZR1KG wrote:Then it isn't even news worthy.
It's junk.
Willie Sutton wrote:Why do I rob banks?
Because that's where they keep the money
SciFiFisher wrote:But I want my cheap limitless power source now damn it!
Gullible Jones wrote:SciFiFisher wrote:But I want my cheap limitless power source now damn it!
Edit 2: oh wait I see what you did there - throwing out one conservation law (conservation of momentum) puts them all in jeapardy, right?
[T]he EM Drive’s thrust was due to the Quantum Vacuum (the quantum state with the lowest possible energy) behaving like propellant ions behave in a MagnetoHydroDynamics drive (a method electrifying propellant and then directing it with magnetic fields to push a spacecraft in the opposite direction) for spacecraft propulsion.
The simulation for the 100 Watts input power (as used in the latest tests at NASA) predicted only ~50 microNewtons (in agreement with the experiments) using the HDPE dielectric insert, while the 10 kiloWatts simulation (without a dielectric) predicted a thrust level of ~6.0 Newtons. At 100 kiloWatts the prediction is ~1300 Newton thrust.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests