https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nat ... story.html
IDK about hist trustworthiness on this statement, or whether this is legally reasonable; but at a glance I don't see why he'd want to delay out of his own interests. And witness intimidation is... not exactly new territory for Trump, nor is threatening harm to children to get what he wants. (See: Stormy Daniels, CPB child separation policy.)
Let's face it, you wouldn't put this past him, would you? But good luck getting the Republican party to care. (This is after all what they stand for.)