Apparently an inflationary multiverse is empirically proven

Apparently an inflationary multiverse is empirically proven

Postby lady_*nix » Sat Aug 27, 2022 5:17 pm

I haven't been following cosmology and physics stuff much since college, so when reading this interview with Laura Mersini-Houghton

https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... -interview

This part was an absolute bombshell for me:

When the process of separation [of universes] happens, that’s the point when the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is created. So all the inflation fluctuations will leave scarring or dents as a result of this entanglement, and those will be imprinted on our [universe’s] CMB. That was something that we could calculate. So I calculated the strength of entanglement between the different branches and how quickly that entanglement gets washed out. That allowed me to find out how much denting or scarring that entanglement would leave on our sky as it was being created during inflation, and then fast-forward to the present day, to make predictions on how those very large-scale anomalies would look. One of the key predictions of cosmic inflation is that everything is sprinkled uniformly throughout the sky. But now the scarring coming from entanglement with the other universes is modifying or denting that uniformity, violating it at very mild scales. We predicted those, and they were seen by the Planck satellite [in 2013].


Wanna weigh in on this, Rommie? :D The idea that prior entanglement could leave detectable traces is also new to me TBH, but then a) I don't know jack about quantum mechanics beyond the surface level layperson stuff, and b) the entanglement cases I have heard about are mostly with... photons, various fermions, maybe the odd whole atom or little cloud of Bose-Einstein condensate. Nothing like entire infant universes stuffed with > 10^53 kg of hot particles.
User avatar
lady_*nix
 
Posts: 1180
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 8:21 pm

Re: Apparently an inflationary multiverse is empirically pro

Postby Rommie » Mon Aug 29, 2022 4:12 pm

Literally never heard of this (or her) before, but it's a big universe. But um yeah, based off that quote alone I'm a bit skeptical. Everyone who studies cosmology knows that anisotropy in the early universe was known before Planck, and rapid inflation in the very early universe is the reason for this. Finding indications of multiverses in that early CMB noise is also definitely a sub-field in itself (I interviewed someone else looking for them once), but my understanding there is Planck does not have significant evidence for that, and you probably need more detail to figure that out.

So, I'm not saying it's wrong, but I certainly wouldn't say empirically proven even if she says she's done so in an interview. Sorry!
Yes, I have a life. It's quite different from yours.
User avatar
Rommie
 
Posts: 4057
Joined: Mon May 27, 2013 10:04 am

Re: Apparently an inflationary multiverse is empirically pro

Postby lady_*nix » Mon Aug 29, 2022 4:23 pm

That's okay, and thank you! LOL this is one reason of many why it's awesome having you around here.
User avatar
lady_*nix
 
Posts: 1180
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 8:21 pm

Re: Apparently an inflationary multiverse is empirically pro

Postby grapes » Thu Sep 22, 2022 8:56 pm

And, it could be just dirt on the lens

But which lens ...
User avatar
grapes
Resident News Hound
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 7:51 pm


Return to Sci-Tech… and Stuff

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

cron