Long and short of it: two parents who had a 3 year old and a 1 year old were making a passage from Mexico to the Marquesas Isles, but after two weeks they needed to be rescued from 900 miles into the ocean when their vessel was unsteerable, and their daughter who'd had salmonella poisoning a week before they left had a rash and fever. So now everyone's shouting they're completely irresponsible for doing so.
I mean, on the one hand reading their blog it's not entirely clear what went wrong, but it sounds to me like these people might've been a touch underprepared (maybe you can read more between the lines)- they kept going between becalmed and stormy weather in a 36 foot monohull to the point where it sounds like their sails just got destroyed. Second, I heard it once and I agree it's probably a good rule of thumb that one shouldn't take a child into a circumstance where if they're ill they can't tell you what hurts, be that remote ocean or third world hellhole. I think showing kids the world is excellent of course, and this would be an incredible adventure when your kids are older (at minimum, can follow basic instructions), but I don't think I'd want a baby out in the ocean where she spends a week unable to sleep due to the waves who'd just had salmonella poisoning. I mean, at least stick close to shore.
Anyway, just thought if you guys have time to comment I'd like to hear your thoughts.

