Sigma_Orionis wrote:although not for long
Sigma_Orionis wrote:Here's an audio interview with the president of a think tank called Inter-American Dialogue where he says that THIS time we probably won't end up in the Zombie Apocalypse, but that if the economic situation doesn't get better, next time we probably will
geonuc wrote:Yes, with all the unstable areas in the world right now, the supply of trainable fascists has dwindled recently causing an increase in cost. You just can't buy a cheap mercenary these days.
SciFiFisher wrote:Sigma_Orionis wrote:Here's an audio interview with the president of a think tank called Inter-American Dialogue where he says that THIS time we probably won't end up in the Zombie Apocalypse, but that if the economic situation doesn't get better, next time we probably will
Here are a few survival tips if it come to that.
That reaction is legitimate, and it is exactly the one the government is looking for. They want a repeat of 2002-2004, they want to force us into supporting coups, strikes, and walking out of elections. That is why we should go against our gut and do the exact opposite.
Sitting out the replacement election, as some have suggested, would be a massive mistake, similar to the one we made in 2005. Not only would we be betraying the thousands of gochos battling out in the streets, we would be giving away a prominent political office that is ours to begin with, and that will most likely remain ours. The government simply cannot win the mayorship of San Cristóbal – and nothing they do can change that. The same holds true for San Diego. Not participating would mean letting them off easy.
What if we’ve got it all wrong? What if Washington is just bluffing, and the votes at the OAS are coming out … exactly the way they want them to come out? What if Washington wants Maduro to stay in power while appearing to really want him not to?
I honestly doubt that Venezuela has now become more influential in the Caribbean than Washington has. Something doesn’t fit with that story, which may just mean … we’ve had it wrong all these years.
FZR1KG wrote:Rommie wrote:FZR1KG wrote:I was forced to go to a tea party once by my MIL.
I was surrounded by women who discussed nothing but the flavours and the rituals of preparing and drinking tea.
Not sure why this new "tea party" has anything to in common with them.
I mean, they had loads of practical information on a subject and it made sense.
Huh?
Just me wondering how two things both called "tea party" are world apart.
The making sense stuff was the tea party I went to, not the one that is now infamous.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest