SciFi Chick wrote:As per usual, I get some of my best news from The Daily Show
Until now, it hadn't really clicked with me that denying science doesn't just occur in religious circles or conservative politics. Very disturbing. I'm so sick of people thinking science is a belief system.
My own pet non-science believing thing is GMOs, but I just think there hasn't been enough study of them. However, I could be wrong, and I'm always open to that. I have a friend who's a scientist, and he's convinced there is no problem with GMOs. Maybe we need to start looking at what GMOs we're speaking about since everything gets modified, whether it's in a lab or by splicing two plants together. But that's another discussion.
There is, however, consensus and plenty of evidence for climate change and the use of vaccines. And yet, conservatives refuse to believe in climate change, and lots of liberals are refusing to believe in the power of vaccines. At least here in the U.S. Not sure about other places. I think vaccines should be required by law, because too many people are now at risk as a result of the anti-vaccine movement.
I'm mainly posting this because I was really surprised to see that it was liberals who are pushing this nonsense. Glad to have that fallacy out of my head.
Morrolan wrote:vaccination should be mandatory and unvaccinated kids should not be allowed to attend schools.
gethen wrote:SciFi, on the subject of GMO's: my elder son has a colleague and good friend who is an internationally known geneticist, and he has a somewhat negative view of GMO's, but not out of concern for food safety. He says that the potential problem when we genetically modify say, wheat, to produce larger grains or grow faster, is that we simply don't know what else we might be modifying as we'll. Genes interact in ways that we simply don't yet understand, and he worries about a time when some ancient but long dormant grain disease might lay waste to the world's wheat harvest because the genes that had evolved to protect the wheat from that disease were unknowingly altered in pursuit of some other advantage. At the very least, one hopes that original copies of the altered plants are being kept for just such an eventuality.
gethen wrote:SciFi, on the subject of GMO's: my elder son has a colleague and good friend who is an internationally known geneticist, and he has a somewhat negative view of GMO's, but not out of concern for food safety. He says that the potential problem when we genetically modify say, wheat, to produce larger grains or grow faster, is that we simply don't know what else we might be modifying as we'll. Genes interact in ways that we simply don't yet understand, and he worries about a time when some ancient but long dormant grain disease might lay waste to the world's wheat harvest because the genes that had evolved to protect the wheat from that disease were unknowingly altered in pursuit of some other advantage. At the very least, one hopes that original copies of the altered plants are being kept for just such an eventuality.
SciFi Chick wrote:And now we have ignorant, idiot parents refusing Vitamin K shots for their newborns.
SciFi Chick wrote:And now we have ignorant, idiot parents refusing Vitamin K shots for their newborns.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests