by FZR1KG » Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:22 pm
I think what it comes down to is basic statistics.
The USA has more guns per capita than any country IIRC.
Over 50% are armed.
Lets look at the implications of that fact.
The I.Q. distribution curve peaks around 100.
Now, I don't know about anyone else here but my experiences with people that have 100 I.Q. are not that great.
Most have trouble thinking through relatively basic maths. Far simpler than that required to understand the trajectory of a high powered firearm.
Reasoning of cause and effect are limited and when that reasoning involves a weapon that can kill a person through a building beyond the shooters visibility, over 2 miles, I doubt many can think through what that actually means in terms of how to safely use a firearm.
Since almost anyone in the USA can get a firearm (there is no testing requirement), the bell curve of I.Q's would also be representative of the bell curve of I.Q's of gun owners.
That means the average I.Q. of a gun owner is also the average I.Q. of the general population.
That scares the fuck out of me. Just saying.
It means people that have very little reasoning ability are more likely to own a firearm than those who have the capacity to use them safely because they can understand the capabilities of the weapon.
That literally translates to 10's of millions of people that are not fit to own or use a firearm, both own and use them.
Want to know why the majority of people in the USA that own guns are fuckwits, there's the answer to your question.
It explains why a five year old kid is bought a firearm for a present and accidently shoots his sibling.
It answers why so many people get injured or killed using firearms accidentally.
It explains why civilian joggers accidentally get killed by gun owners just jogging in a park.
It explains why the NRA defends a 16 year olds right to hunt with a high calibre weapon in a fog after accidentally killing a person because he mistook a human for a bear. In a fucking fog!
It explains why the USA is the only country I know of that forces hunters to use florescent jackets yet hunting accidents are higher than those countries who use cammo to hunt in or simply plain clothes.
It's no accident.
That's simply the result of giving people who aren't fit to own or use a weapon, the right to purchase what they want without training or testing.
Combine that with the attitude that US gun owners have and it simply magnifies the effect.
What do I mean by that?
The obsession for more power. Why more power?
Because it takes LESS skill to kill an animal.
They trade competence for incompetence and use higher power weapons than required for the task to make up the difference.
It explains the reason people from other countries look at what happens in the USA and see that it doesn't happen in other countries then conclude there is something wrong. It's because there is.
Last edited by FZR1KG on Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:13 am, edited 1 time in total.