squ1d wrote:I really really really hope you guys elect Hillary Clinton.
Watching the coverage, it again strikes me how manifestly undemocratic the electoral college system is.
SciFiFisher wrote:Another theory I have heard is that the electors are a check on the possibility of a dictator, demagogue, or a particularly unqualified candidate (cough cough Trump) winning the popular vote. In theory they could elect the candidate who came in second.
Rommie wrote:- We will now likely lose the last window of opportunity to do something about climate change and the irreparable damage it will do to the planet.
Rommie wrote:I have a friend who is a gay marriage advocate who is a little concerned right now that there is essentially a federal database of gay people in the USA, as so many have taken part in their right to get married in recent years.
Swift wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY
Rommie wrote:After talking to several old white dudes today reassuring me it'll be ok
pumpkinpi wrote:Swift wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY
What is it? My browser can't play it because it's in restricted mode.
As in Britain earlier this year, we learn an uncomfortable truth today: that there are plenty of people outside our privileged enclave for whom the system *isn't* working. Indeed, it is working so poorly for them that they're prepared to vote for *anything but* the status quo, no matter what that may mean. This is a genuine crisis for western democracy, and it tells us that, truly, inequality is the key issue of our time, and, alas, one that the new government will surely only make worse. It is a time to be vigilant, friends, for let us not forget that the Weimar Republic was the most progressive society in the world at the time of its fall. Let us not surrender progress without a fight.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest