SciFi Chick wrote:I really wish people would quit giving Melania Trump shit. She submitted her bio to the White House website, and it's about her modeling career as well as her jewelry line, and both the media and a bunch of assholes are deriding her for it.
I wonder if any of these "critics" can speak six languages.
vendic wrote:Hypocrisy, politics, apart from spelling, is there a real difference? lol
code monkey wrote:do you recall the things that were said and written about michelle, malia and sasha Obama? no comparison.
melania is perfectly happy to stay with a person whom I see as a monster. I don't care how physically beautiful she is or how many languages she speaks; in my book that makes her pretty monstrous.
squ1d wrote:1. The illegal thing
2. Fuck anyone with the surname Trump
SciFi Chick wrote:squ1d wrote:1. The illegal thing
What illegal thing?2. Fuck anyone with the surname Trump
Including their ten-year-old son?
Rommie wrote:I genuinely haven't really heard about anyone giving Melania grief. Is this seriously a thing, more than a rabid idiot fringe who is always inevitably doing that stuff?
vendic wrote:What's the difference between a Rottweiler and political journalists?
The former lets go when you hit it hard enough on the head.
squ1d wrote:SciFi Chick wrote:squ1d wrote:1. The illegal thing
What illegal thing?2. Fuck anyone with the surname Trump
Including their ten-year-old son?
1. Using public office to advertise your businesses
2. Monster-in-training
squ1d wrote:Melania is a victim why now?
Because vagina?
No.... she's off limits because she didn't and hasn't injected herself into the political arena. The fact that she is married to a serial abuser is secondary.squ1d wrote:So Melania is off limits but you're allowed to speculate that she's in an abusive relationship?
DimSum wrote:No.... she's off limits because she didn't and hasn't injected herself into the political arena. The fact that she is married to a serial abuser is secondary.squ1d wrote:So Melania is off limits but you're allowed to speculate that she's in an abusive relationship?
But just as important.
Am I what? Nice? No. Speculating? No. He is condemned by his own words and actions. Would I (or did I) pick on the Bush girls, in their time? No. Even when they were picked up for underage drinking, which I thought was a bit foolish, but they weren't part of the political landscape. Their parents were, their father, more than their mother. Did I refer to GW Bush as anything other than Mr. Bush or POTUS? I tried not to. He was President of the United States. I didn't like him, I didn't vote for him, but he held the highest office in the country. He drew my ire, repeatedly. I spoke out against him, often. I thought his policies sucked. But he didn't condemn himself as a serial abuser of women, a misogynist, a bigot, a racist or someone with an alternate view of reality either.squ1d wrote:DimSum wrote:No.... she's off limits because she didn't and hasn't injected herself into the political arena. The fact that she is married to a serial abuser is secondary.squ1d wrote:So Melania is off limits but you're allowed to speculate that she's in an abusive relationship?
But just as important.
So you are then?
code monkey wrote:do you recall the things that were said and written about michelle, malia and sasha Obama? no comparison.
SciFi Chick wrote:So it's time to seek revenge and behave exactly like the people we oppose?
code monkey wrote:no, not at all. I never said that nor did I mean to imply it. (as for revenge, that would have it directed at the wrong target.) however, I've not forgotten rush Limbaugh referring to Chelsea Clinton as the white house dog, the cartoons of the Obama girls or michelle Obama being called a gorilla in heels. I consider those far worse than the criticism aimed at mrs trump.
code monkey wrote:melania is perfectly happy to stay with a person whom I see as a monster. I don't care how physically beautiful she is or how many languages she speaks; in my book that makes her pretty monstrous.
SciFi Chick wrote:Her body language indicates that she's being abused. I'm going to give her the benefit of the doubt, for the moment.
code monkey wrote:many people have said that and I think that there's a fair amount of projection involved. body language is far from a science and this conclusion is based on seeing brief films of her.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests