by grapes » Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:58 pm
XOF SINFUL NEWS
As part of the on-going XOF re-education initiative, we have contacted Professor Candy Harhar of the University of Western Bilabong to explain the so-called Syrian situation. Her answers proved to be very informative, and, we think, surprising.
Q: Prof. Harhar, if the US attacks Syria, whose side are they on?
Professor Candy: Good question. Obama has said no one can presume that a US attack will be in support of any one side. The US will be attacking chemical weapons, not ideologies.
Q: What if the US accidentally destroys people, instead of chemical weapons?
PC: O, they will. The Syria regime has moved its troops into civilian areas already. The rebels are already embedded, of course.
Q: But, but, which religious group should we attack then?
PC: No religious group, religious groups are not the enemy.
Q: Shouldn't we be attacking Al Qaeda?
PC: Al Qaeda is an extremist offshoot of the Sunni religion started in Pakistan by Osama bin Laden. The Syrian rebels are predominantly Sunni.
Q: So, the US should be helping the Syrian regime!
PC: Uh, well, the Syrian regime is headed by Bashar al-Assad. He and his father have ruled Syria for over forty years. They are of the Alawhite religion, a sect of the Shi'a, a minority in Syria.
Q: So, the US *should* attack the rebels! Why wouldn't they help the minority regime?
PC: Hmm, the regime are the ones who have apparently used the chemical weapons against the Sunni rebels. At times, the regime has been helped by the Lebanese Hezbollah, a Shi'a militant group.
Q: Hezbollah! Yikes, we gotta kill *them*!
PC: If you have to kill someone...some reports are saying al Habib is supplying chemical weapons to the rebels. I thought the idea was to target chemical weapons?
Q: Right. How do we do that?
PC: Get rid of STEM education.